Our goal is not to make complex mobility decisions look simple. It is to make every useful claim easier to trace, compare and verify.
Primary sources first
Visa, immigration, residence and tax claims should begin with government portals, legislation, consular instructions or other competent public authorities. Secondary summaries may help discovery but do not replace the primary source.
Facts, estimates and opinions stay separate
A legal requirement is a factual claim. A monthly budget is an estimate. A destination score is an editorial comparison. We label and review these categories differently because they carry different levels of certainty.
Dates are part of the evidence
Every high-impact guide should show when it was published and when its core sources were last checked. A page without a recent review date should not be treated as current legal or tax guidance.
No invented experience
We do not present AI-generated prose as first-hand experience. Local observations must come from a named contributor, documented field research or clearly identified external evidence.
Corrections are visible
When a material claim changes, the page should be updated, the review date should move and the correction should not be hidden behind silent rewriting when the change affects a user decision.
VistoNomadi scores
Comparative signals, not scientific measurements
Destination scores are normalized editorial indicators designed to compare places inside the current VistoNomadi dataset. They are not government statistics, credit ratings or guarantees of personal experience.
- Housing and everyday cost
- Internet and work infrastructure
- Mobility and practical access
- Climate and seasonality
- Safety and daily-life friction
- Visa and residence complexity
- Community and long-stay suitability